I thought creativity was a mysterious muse that visited only the gifted. Then therapy taught me that creativity isn’t something you wait for, it’s something you unblock. Here’s how healing my inner world unlocked my outer expression.
For years, I believed I had a creativity problem. I would sit in front of blank pages, blank canvases, blank documents, and feel absolutely nothing. Or worse, I would feel everything: a swirling, suffocating fog of pressure, self-doubt, and the quiet, cruel whisper that maybe I just wasn’t creative anymore. Maybe I never really was.
I tried all the prescribed remedies. I changed my environment. I bought fancy notebooks and beautiful pens. I waited for the muse to descend like a benevolent goddess.
I read books about morning pages and creative habits and the artist’s way. Some of it helped, temporarily. But the block always returned, heavier than before, because now I was also failing at my own creative recovery.
It never occurred to me that the block wasn’t the problem. It was a symptom. And the root cause wasn’t living in my workspace.
It was living in my childhood, my unprocessed grief, my perfectionism, my deeply held belief that my voice wasn’t worth hearing. So, I did something that felt entirely unrelated to art: I went to therapy.
What I discovered there changed not just how I create, but why.
The first wall to crumble was the myth of the tortured artist. I had romanticized my own suffering, secretly believing that my anxiety and self-criticism were the price of admission to the creative club.
If I wasn’t suffering, was I even a real artist? My therapist looked at this belief with gentle skepticism. “What if the suffering isn’t fuel,” she said, “but friction?” She helped me see that my anxiety wasn’t inspiring my work; it was suffocating it before it could even breathe.
My inner critic wasn’t a discerning editor; it was a bouncer at the door, turning away every half-formed idea before it had a chance to prove itself.
We started excavating the origin of that critic. Where did this voice come from? Whose standards was I failing to meet? I traced it back to a third-grade art teacher who praised only the neat, the literal, the compliant.
To a parent who meant well but always asked, “Is that actually good, or are you just having fun?” To a culture that taught me that creativity was a commodity, valuable only when it produced something marketable, impressive, worthy of applause.
My therapist didn’t dismiss my desire for excellence. She simply asked, “What would it feel like to make something just for the joy of it? Just to see what emerges?”
That question became a doorway.
Therapy gave me something I hadn’t had since childhood: permission to play. We explored the concept of the “inner critic” versus the “inner creator.” The critic, I learned, is not the enemy to be vanquished; it is a frightened protector, trying to keep me safe from humiliation and rejection.
But it had become overprotective, locking the studio doors and throwing away the key. In therapy, I learned to thank the critic for its vigilance and gently ask it to step outside while I worked. I learned to create “shitty first drafts” on purpose, to paint ugly paintings I would never show anyone, to write pages I would immediately delete. The goal was not mastery. The goal was momentum.
This permission to be imperfect was revolutionary. I started noticing how my perfectionism wasn’t just about fear of bad work, it was a form of control. I wanted to guarantee the outcome before I even began.
But creativity doesn’t work that way. It is inherently vulnerable, inherently uncertain. Therapy taught me to tolerate that uncertainty, to sit in the discomfort of not knowing, to trust that something would emerge if I just stayed in the room long enough. I learned to value process over product, not as a platitude, but as a daily practice.
Then, unexpectedly, the deeper work began. Creativity, I discovered, is not just about generating ideas. It is about accessing the full range of your inner world, the light and the shadow.
For years, I had been compartmentalizing my difficult emotions, stuffing grief, anger, and sadness into mental boxes labeled “deal with later.” But those boxes were taking up space. They were draining the energy I needed for creative flow.
In therapy, I began to open them, slowly and gently, with a witness who wasn’t afraid of what we might find. And as I processed old wounds and unexpressed feelings, something remarkable happened: color returned to my internal palette.
I started writing not in spite of my pain, but through it. I painted the grief I couldn’t articulate in words. I wrote characters who carried pieces of my own unspoken history.
My most personal, vulnerable work became my most resonant, not because it was perfectly crafted, but because it was honest. Therapy didn’t give me new experiences to draw from; it gave me access to the experiences I had been avoiding.
This is the paradox at the heart of using therapy for creativity. We think the creative self is this fragile, precious thing that must be protected from the messiness of psychological work.
We fear that examining our wounds will somehow drain them of their artistic power. But the opposite is true. Unexamined wounds don’t fuel creativity; they block it. They become the heavy lid on the well. Therapy doesn’t steal your material; it unclogs the pipe.
I also learned that creativity is not a solitary act. For all our romanticizing of the lone genius, humans are wired for connection and co-creation. My therapist became my first audience, a safe witness to my emerging voice.
She held space for my tentative experiments, my failed attempts, my embarrassing first drafts. Her nonjudgmental presence taught me that creativity requires community or at least one person who sees you and says, “Keep going. I want to see what you make next.”
Today, I don’t wait for the muse. I don’t believe in her anymore. Instead, I believe in showing up, in the small daily practice of making something from nothing.
I believe in the therapeutic truth that we are all endlessly, beautifully creative beings, not because we produce exceptional work, but because creativity is the language of the soul trying to express itself.
Therapy didn’t teach me to be more creative. It taught me to stop blocking my own creative nature. It removed the boulders from the riverbed and let the water flow again.
The blank page still intimidates me sometimes. The inner critic still whispers. But now I have tools, not tricks. I have self-compassion instead of self-flagellation.
I have curiosity instead of condemnation. And I have the deep, embodied knowing that my creativity was never broken, it was just waiting for me to clear the path back to myself.
References
Blatner, A. (2002). *Using creativity to explore in psychotherapy*. *Psychiatric Times, 20*(6). Retrieved from https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/using-creativity-explore-psychotherapy
Strang, C. E., et al. (2024). *Art therapy and neuroscience: Evidence, limits, and myths*. *Frontiers in Psychology, 15*, Article 1484481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1484481
Jean‑Berluche, D., et al. (2024). *Creative expression and mental health*. *Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 57*, Article 101371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101371
King, J. L. (2017). *The benefits of creativity in therapy*. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), *The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains* (pp. 462–478). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316276834.028
American Psychiatric Association. (n.d.). *Creative arts: Enhancing mental health and well‑being*. Retrieved from https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/apa-blogs/creative-arts-enhancing-mental-health
